We have just seen that three separate domain names have been saved, all in single panel WIPO cases this week, The domain names and cases are below, It’s good seeing more cases being denied from a domain name investors perspective.
We often get called cybersquatters because we refuse to sell our digital real estate too cheap… I 100% understand when domain names are transferred for the correct reasons, where an obvious TM breach has occurred or someone is using a typo domain name for a phishing scam etc but too many domain names get lost to illegitimate WIPO cases IMO.
What do you think? Are domain name investors given a bad hand when it comes to WIPO cases?
Domain Name Case 1 – Access Spa
|WIPO Case Number||D2020-1156|
|Respondent||Peter Tsz-Man Chan, Cykon Technology Limited|
|Panelist||Rothnie, Warwick A.|
Domain Name Case 2 – Nami Investment
|WIPO Case Number||D2020-1097|
|Respondent||Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o., Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o. / Royal Europa Sp. z o.o.|
|Panelist||Blackmer, W. Scott|
Domain Name Case 3 – Leak Testing Academy
|WIPO Case Number||D2020-1000|
|Respondent||Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot / Cyan Yo|
Need to register a domain name – Use one of these links below and we earn a small commission and you get GREAT Deals.